⏴ go to previous day
08:15:36  *** Supercheese has quit IRC

08:28:24  *** fonsinchen has joined #openttd.dev

08:28:24  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v fonsinchen

12:46:50  *** fonsinchen has quit IRC

14:19:48  *** ntoskrnl has joined #openttd.dev

14:36:09  *** Ristovski has joined #openttd.dev

15:02:59  <planetmaker> In http://bugs.openttd.org/task/5472 I attached a patch... IMHO it makes sense to use same-sized widgets for both cases there. But which size?

15:13:03  *** Ristovski has quit IRC

15:13:25  *** Ristovski has joined #openttd.dev

17:17:11  *** Aphid has quit IRC

17:22:19  *** frosch123 has joined #openttd.dev

17:22:19  *** ChanServ sets mode: +v frosch123

17:31:29  *** ntoskrnl has quit IRC

18:45:43  *** DorpsGek changes topic to "OpenTTD Dev Channel || Latest SVN: r25063 || Logs: http://webster.openttdcoop.org/?channel=openttd.dev || Voice (talk-right) upon request via #openttd; make sure you are registered to NickServ before asking"

19:01:07  <planetmaker> any thought on the size of the station preview sprites? http://bugs.openttd.org/task/5472/getfile/8951/fs5472_complete.diff

19:13:20  <frosch123> are they the same now?

19:15:22  <frosch123> the other buttons have (32, 16) instead of (31, 16)

19:15:31  <frosch123> is there also an issue with the width?

19:16:01  <frosch123> minimal size is also (66,48) vs (66, 49)

19:16:09  <frosch123> why are they all off-by-one? :o

19:18:12  <planetmaker> hm...

19:49:14  <planetmaker> frosch123, I think they should be centred in the list... but 32 seems much saner indeed

19:49:29  <frosch123> i have no idea :p

19:49:44  <frosch123> i would use kmag if in doubt :)

19:50:08  <planetmaker> :-)

19:50:14  <frosch123> didn't the newstat sprites use the whole area?

19:50:19  <frosch123> so it should be easy to compare

19:51:04  <planetmaker> would you rather prefer the smaller version, the larger or something in between?

19:51:26  <planetmaker> as in the height which we give the sprites. Using the same makes perfect sense imho

19:51:57  <frosch123> the smaller one would be most compatible, but i think the bigger one looks nicer :p

19:52:28  <planetmaker> I don't think that the bigger one would be much of a pain, even if the set defines a smaller image

19:52:36  <frosch123> actually, judging by the screenshot from fs

19:52:43  <frosch123> the buttons on the left also have weird sizes

19:53:35  <planetmaker> which buttons? Numbers?

19:53:53  <frosch123> https://secure.openttd.org/bugs/task/5472/getfile/8911/preview.png <- take the second orientation

19:53:59  <frosch123> you can see the button border at top and left

19:54:02  <frosch123> but not right and bottom

19:54:33  <frosch123> hmm, no

19:54:50  <frosch123> according to kmag there is a empty pixel row at the bottom

19:55:09  <planetmaker> of the direction buttons?

19:55:19  <frosch123> orientation, yes

19:55:38  <frosch123> the preview does not fill the whole button

19:55:45  <frosch123> but at the bottom there is one pixelrow left

19:55:57  <planetmaker> true. Stupid :-)

19:55:57  <frosch123> but ofc. maybe the sprites just end there :p

19:56:05  <planetmaker> I'll check that as well with others

19:56:18  <planetmaker> I don't have his grf anyway ;-)

19:56:20  <frosch123> i guess one would have to use a real tile sprite to compare

19:56:27  <frosch123> not these arbirtarily filled ones

19:56:45  <frosch123> you only have bananas now? :)

19:57:32  <planetmaker> well. I still have the old openttdcoop grfpack... but well

19:57:35  <planetmaker> hardly used

19:57:44  <frosch123> the isr sprites from albert's screenshot fit perfectly

19:57:48  <frosch123> on left/right/bottom

19:57:52  <frosch123> so, maybe use those

19:57:56  <frosch123> and just extend towards top

19:58:00  <planetmaker> and there are some I got elsewhere for testing, but yes, nearly banananana - only. Yes

19:58:29  <planetmaker> yes, I tested with ISR. Will also try chips and DWE

19:59:05  <frosch123> i guess newobject offsets are completely different :p

19:59:15  <planetmaker> I fear so

20:49:31  <planetmaker> http://devs.openttd.org/~planetmaker/patches/index.php?source=fs5472_complete.diff this looks similar enough code-wise and also from the graphics it now is the same. Big button size

20:51:17  <frosch123> :)

20:54:59  <planetmaker> so... going for big button size?

20:55:07  <planetmaker> I'm really indifferent

20:55:55  <frosch123> isr definitely looks better with the big size

20:56:57  <frosch123> how ever, if you would make it even taller, the plain tiles without building would look weird :)

20:57:42  <planetmaker> taller would look really weired

21:00:45  <planetmaker> the plain tiles w/o building even start to look a bit strange with 60x60. But buildings,... are much better

21:01:34  <frosch123> well, 66x60 is still wider than high

21:01:45  <frosch123> i think it should stay landscape :)

21:01:56  <planetmaker> :-)

21:02:14  <planetmaker> that I agree with

21:23:39  *** DorpsGek changes topic to "OpenTTD Dev Channel || Latest SVN: r25064 || Logs: http://webster.openttdcoop.org/?channel=openttd.dev || Voice (talk-right) upon request via #openttd; make sure you are registered to NickServ before asking"

21:30:59  <planetmaker> btw, what do you think of fonsinchen's patch today, the one with loading? FS5495

21:31:13  <planetmaker> looks reasonable to me - but I'm not sure whether it can have side effects

21:31:45  <frosch123> well, lots of stuff is changing in the loading code

21:31:55  <frosch123> i still think it is incorrect that transfer cargos get no rating

21:33:53  <planetmaker> yes... but FS5495?

21:34:01  <Rubidium> just give them their ratings back ;)

21:34:11  <Rubidium> it might just've been an unforeseen side effect

21:34:27  <planetmaker> I'd think so, yes

21:47:39  *** frosch123 has quit IRC

22:39:45  *** Ristovski has quit IRC

23:07:52  *** Supercheese has joined #openttd.dev

continue to next day ⏵