IRC logs for #openttd.dev on OFTC at 2013-01-27
            
00:38:51 *** frosch123 has quit IRC
01:12:21 *** FLHerne has quit IRC
08:30:36 *** Supercheese has left #openttd.dev
08:38:08 *** Alberth has joined #openttd.dev
08:38:08 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v Alberth
09:05:46 *** andythenorth has joined #openttd.dev
09:05:46 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v andythenorth
09:56:39 *** ntoskrnl has joined #openttd.dev
10:16:44 *** frosch123 has joined #openttd.dev
10:16:44 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v frosch123
10:56:10 *** andythenorth has quit IRC
11:10:42 *** fonsinchen has joined #openttd.dev
11:10:42 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v fonsinchen
12:08:30 *** andythenorth has joined #openttd.dev
12:08:30 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v andythenorth
14:16:39 *** fonsinchen has quit IRC
14:41:48 *** fonsinchen has joined #openttd.dev
14:41:48 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v fonsinchen
16:44:01 *** Zuu__ has joined #openttd.dev
16:58:59 *** Zuu___ has joined #openttd.dev
17:03:52 *** Zuu___ has quit IRC
17:05:24 *** Zuu__ has quit IRC
17:07:14 *** fonsinchen has quit IRC
17:39:45 <frosch123> http://paste.openttdcoop.org/show/2079/ <- fs#5452
17:40:35 <frosch123> remove some optimisation magic and replacing it with something robust to side-effects
17:57:05 <Alberth> I had a look too, but I couldn't really fix it :)
17:57:27 <Alberth> the idea seems sound to me
17:58:37 *** andythenorth has quit IRC
18:08:44 *** Zuu has joined #openttd.dev
18:08:44 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v Zuu
18:09:27 <frosch123> hmm, something about mixing order pointers and order indices is really stupid
18:09:40 <frosch123> but the remaining use cases of DeleteOrder look fine
18:09:45 <frosch123> and i have no better idea :)
18:11:17 *** DorpsGek changes topic to "OpenTTD Dev Channel || Latest SVN: r24944 || Logs: http://webster.openttdcoop.org/?channel=openttd.dev || Voice (talk-right) upon request via #openttd; make sure you are registered to NickServ before asking"
18:11:42 <Alberth> perhaps it's just the unclarity which one is leading?
18:12:27 <Alberth> ie if you'd delete order->next and order->prev, it would be clear that the integer is used to jump between orders
18:12:52 <Alberth> (but that will probably fail because the integer eventually also uses those pointers :) )
18:14:25 <frosch123> well, clearly the integer is leading, but using an integer index to access a linked list is not exactly nice :)
18:16:35 <Alberth> you'd have to make smallvectors of order lists then
18:16:45 <Alberth> S/of/for/
18:26:39 *** ntoskrnl has quit IRC
18:45:30 *** DorpsGek changes topic to "OpenTTD Dev Channel || Latest SVN: r24945 || Logs: http://webster.openttdcoop.org/?channel=openttd.dev || Voice (talk-right) upon request via #openttd; make sure you are registered to NickServ before asking"
19:00:35 *** andythenorth has joined #openttd.dev
19:00:35 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v andythenorth
19:03:08 *** fonsinchen has joined #openttd.dev
19:03:08 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v fonsinchen
19:58:40 *** Supercheese has joined #openttd.dev
21:14:03 *** Alberth has left #openttd.dev
21:20:43 *** fonsinchen has quit IRC
21:57:04 *** frosch123 has quit IRC
22:07:57 *** andythenorth has quit IRC
22:13:11 *** FLHerne has joined #openttd.dev
23:41:45 *** FLHerne has quit IRC
23:46:10 *** Zuu has quit IRC